Core standard

Accuracy before conversion

Every important claim must be visible on the page, traceable to a source and qualified where eligibility, geography or account status can change the answer.

Source hierarchy

What evidence receives the most weight

  1. 1

    Current Winna policies and help articles

    Used for account flows, limits, eligibility, rewards, supported networks and operator-stated availability.

  2. 2

    Regulator or independently verifiable records

    Used when a licensing or legal claim can be confirmed from the responsible authority.

  3. 3

    Independent review and complaint platforms

    Used to identify reported issues, not to convert anonymous comments into a universal failure rate.

Per-page checks

How a guide is verified

  • Confirm the official source URL returns successfully.
  • Record the exact supported statement and its review date.
  • Separate referral attribution from promotional value.
  • Check titles, canonicals, internal links and structured data.
  • State when hands-on testing is unavailable.
  • Use sponsored and nofollow attributes on affiliate links.

Conflicting evidence

Conflicts are shown, not hidden

If two current sources disagree, the page names the conflict, prefers the most direct primary source and avoids presenting the disputed value as settled. Player complaints are evaluated by date, evidence, operator response and final resolution.

Freshness

Dates change only after a substantive check

We update the visible review date after checking the cited facts or making a material correction. We do not refresh dates merely to make old content appear new. Supported corrections are published promptly.

Search wording can inform what questions a page answers, but it never overrides the evidence.